A Critical Review of Hedonism

A Critical Review of He befoolismAbstractThe term Hedonism hits theories that reckon happiness and cheer in the supreme end of life. Hedonism is the doctrine that frolic is the sole good. (Banks) Within the abominable umpire system there exist two forms of hedonism, mental hedonism and respectable hedonism. Ethical hedonism refers to the view that non just do people undertake frolic, but they excessively ought to seek pleasure be have got pleasure alone is good. (Banks) Psychological hedonism refers to people pursuing pleasure and exactly pleasure in their lives, and that all their activities atomic number 18 directed toward achieving pleasure and voiding disquiet. (Banks) everyplace the years philosophers have tried to distinguish between psychological hedonism and ethical hedonism. What exactly do we need psychological hedonism for? Criminal arbitrator professionals when dealings with psychological hedonism atomic number 18 motivated to maximize him or her pl easure and pain. They be concerned with ethics in our daily lives. In order to gain peoples behavior hedonism comes into play. Banks stakes explanations that the only thing that is charge seeking just for its own sake is pleasure and that pleasure is good. any(prenominal) humans seek pleasure in different focal points.History of Hedonism past Epicureanism founded by Epicurus stated that pleasure is that pleasure is the greatest good. He also appreciated that pursuit of pleasure might itself leave in pain. (Banks, pg. 253) or so the time of the middle ages Hedonism was denounced because Christian philosophers believed it was inconsistent with the Christian emphasis on avoiding sin and doing Gods leave behind. Because of the 19th century ethical guess of utilitarianism philosophers oftentimes(prenominal) as Mill and Bentham developed and refined Hedonism. Bentham believed that the value of pleasure could be quantitatively understood, and Mill on the other hand like a qual itative approach dependent on the mix of high quality pleasures and lower quality, simple pleasures. (Branch/ Doctrine)Hedonism Contribution to the Criminal Justice transcriptionWhat does hedonism contribute to the criminal justice system? Hedonism is used to catch criminal behavior. Behavior such as why they commit the annoyances they do. There is psychological reasoning for everything that happens in our lives. A criminal has a traffic pattern and with this pattern there comes habits. These habits croupe contribute to an investigation and crime scene. If behavioral patterns of criminals are studied then the rate of crime can decrease because of hedonism. correspond to the theory of hedonism, people are supposed to coach towards pleasure and seek pleasure.As I mentioned before psychological hedonism aim is to display pleasure. When utilise to criminal justice psychological hedonism makes a proposal those criminals actions are establish on motivation. On the other hand ethi cal hedonism states that pursuit for pleasure is normative.Looking from a classical perspective crime is seen as the result of a free allow decision meaning it is guided by the plain pleasure principle. The plain pleasure principle refers to people playing in a way that maximizes pleasure and minimizes pain. People are luxuriant when they naturally seek pleasure as every opportunity to avoid pain. When dealing with Hedonism and crime you deem of deterrence. The deterrence theory states that people dont commit crimes because they are afraid of take aimting caught but because they are motivated by some deep moral sense.When pain is associated with any type of crime the punishment is greater than the pleasure derived from the crime. There is a general problem with the theory of crime. First, deterrence is not effective in criminal justice. I think this because apprehension is low. Secondly, hedonism towards short term rejoicing must come from somewhere. (Damer, Pg 33)If applying the theory of hedonism to why criminals commit crimes, it suggest that everyone acts in a different way, analyzing. If the criminal justice system can rag to know the criminal then patterns and thoughts can be established.If hedonism is based on pleasure that is the highest good, can it be proven otherwise? I will mention some examples that would support the reasons that pleasure are not the highest good. For represent lets think about child molesters. These people get a high from raping children. It is ethically violate in any nature. If you refer back to hedonism this act would be considered good because the rapist is receiving pleasure. A hedonist may argue that this is not a good example and that is not the pleasure they speak of because it the long run it will have a bad impact regardless. Sooner or later the rapist/molester will be sentenced to a long life in prison and he will receive much more pain then pleasure. harmonise to Hedonism how is one ought to live? The text gi ves the answer that the good life consists of a life of pleasure and that a person ought to act in such a way as to acquire pleasure. (Banks) When referring back to the beginning with classical philosopher Epicurus, he attempted to find pleasures that did not produce painful consequences. or else he did find that pleasure might be accompanied with pain. He uses the example that, friendship can be accompanied by picture and sadness at the death of a close friend. Im pretty sure everyone has gone through some type of outlet in their life. According to Epicurus he finds it difficult to see how ethical hedonism can function as a guide for behavior in the day-by-day lives of people. He states advising a person to seek pleasure is often also advice to seek pain. (Banks)Hedonism is an ethical theory that states pleasure is the highest good and proper aim of human life. It requires that everyone conducts themselves in ways that acquire reasonable pleasure. Criminal justice professional s can use this theory to find patterns of criminal activity and understand why those actions are used. When referring to ethics and what are morally right and wrong hedonism can play a small part. Distinguishing between pleasure and pain and how to use it depends on the person. For example, if I choose to commit a crime using my own free will that is based on my ideal and no one else I will still understand that any(prenominal) I do can give me pleasure or cause me pain in the long run. When committing a crime you do way the pros and cons and make a conscious decision. Some may probably vocalise pleasure? Or pain? In conclusion there is much criminal justice theory that tries to pin point what people think before they put themselves in danger with criminal actions.ReferencesBanks, C. (2013). Criminal justice ethics Theory and practice (3rd Ed.). United States ofAmerica Sage Publications, Inc. hedonic utilitarianism. (1998). Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press.Rudebusch, G. (1999) . Socrates, pleasure, and value. New York Oxford University Press.